Confused in Cyber Space
I am watching the unfolding of a sad drama. I am watching a man. At least I believe him to be a man stalk a couple of sweet women. I realize that many folks seem to think its ok to follow or
stalk 2 (stôk) http://www.thefreedictionary.com/stalk
v. stalked, stalk·ing, stalks
1. To walk with a stiff, haughty, or angry gait: stalked off in a huff.
2. To move threateningly or menacingly.
3. To track prey or quarry.
1. To pursue by tracking stealthily.
2. To follow or observe (a person) persistently, especially out of obsession or derangement.
3. To go through (an area) in pursuit of prey or quarry.
Stalking is the equivelant of unwanted attention. This attention of the first part causes the party of the second part to be uncomfortable. There for causing undue stress or duress.This is not what I would consider nice or even leagal. I would suggest for people that don't understand what I am talking about email me and ask, or look in a dictionary. Black's law dictionary is a good source.
du·ress (d-rs, dy-)
1. Constraint by threat; coercion: confessed under duress.
a. Coercion illegally applied.
b. Forcible confinement.
As if anyone in todays world needs to be told that they are stalking. I have met mentally ill folks that were off their meds they did indeed have an excuse for their behavior at the time. What I don't comprehend is people that are asked repeatedly to leave someone alone and they do not just go away. There are millions of blogs in the blog-o-sphere. What is the importance of one blog/blogger?
In this nation until the far left get their way we have free speech. Be that speech to the world or anyone listenting.
However what most people ignore is the other side. The side that says yes you have free speech, I have the right to walk away ask nicely that you hush. Oor just do like me and tell the person that I am exercising my free speech at this time and you can shut the fuck up. There are more sides of free speech. Validate your opinion with facts and I will listen. Do not repeat someone's opinion. An editorial is an opinion. Repeating someone elses' speech is not a qualifier for a debate.
I love a debate. I do not like hearing talking points from anyone. Name calling is not necessary to validate a point. I will not call you unAmerican if you were born in the U.S. or became a citizen through leagal channels. I will state you are unAmerican if you are spouting talking points that have come from the communist manafesto. If you spout socialism, I will call you unAmerican.
That is my right. That is the right of any citizen of this nation.
The biggest problem with most women bloggers they ignore jackasses and assume that will get the point accross. They don't understand even a brick in the head don't slow down someone that thick. What they don't understand that the stalker is empowered by this. He has no clue that she is ignoring him. If she says something he takes this as an invitation to bother her. Or he is sadistic and just gets his rocks off that way.
This is the part I really don't comprehend. How the hell can you get a jolly in cyberspace? I mean comm'on really? How strange is this? Geez I bet even Freud would be puzzled.
There is the other part that I am confused about that is bugging the crap out of someone then when they answer deleting them. Debate or moronic behavior?
Assorted Babble Vs. http://www.hayduke.blogspot.com is an example of this Pick on the woman. Get her angry then play the innocent. Delete anyone that disagrees with you. I ask again what kind of sh** is that?